Knowledge center
Blog Home
Equilar Blog
Performance Metrics Rigor Gets Renewed Focus in 2015
January 8, 2015
Performance Metrics
As mentioned in
Agenda’s recent article, ‘Comp Committees Gun for Better Pay Metrics’
by Lisa Botter:
“Executive compensation data firm Equilar’s recent Compensation and Governance Outlook Report for 2015 found that companies
were focusing on metrics.
‘When setting the metrics for incentive plans, the ability for targets to be achieved has become a focal point for
issuers, shareholders and proxy advisors,’ the report states. ‘In the event that the metrics are not perceived to be
rigorous enough, companies can subject themselves to criticism from shareholders or proxy advisors.’”
Incentive plans are frequently designed with specific
threshold, target, and maximum payouts depending on associated performance metrics. In addition, each metric often has
its own threshold, target, and maximum values that determine percentage payouts. When defining the metrics for incentive
plans, setting achievable targets have become a focal point for issuers, shareholders, and proxy advisors. Companies
frequently disclose the rigor of selected performance metrics that are featured in both annual and long-term incentive
plans. In the event that metrics are not perceived to be rigorous, companies may be further scrutinized by shareholders
or proxy advisors.
Several companies address rigor in some form within the proxy statement in an effort to combat potential criticism.
Increasing targets or changing companies used in performance peer groups are common ways to increase the rigor within
incentive plans.